A Syringe Full of Death

I have learned many things in the last twelve months but the one thing I’ve learned for certain is that there are far more lob dotterels, joltheads and lobcocks around than I would have thought possible.

There are, it seems to me, many truly evil people in the world, of course – those such as Bill Gates of Hell and Anal Schwab, the man with less brain than a cotton bud. I knew about them – they hardly hide away.

But it is the number of lob dotterels, joltheads and lobcocks which has astonished me.

These are the numbskulls who wear their masks (going out of their way to purchase and wear pretty coloured ones, and genuinely thinking they look good in them) and they are the half-wits who queue up to have an experimental jab which they don’t need and which won’t do what they think it will do.

If you’re not a fan of Victorian vocabulary, by the way, the more modern word `dickhead’ will do just as well as any of those I used earlier.

The bottom line is that anyone who wears a mask and has one of the covid jabs needs locking up for their own protection.

And then there are the jab drummers: the celebrities who are so willing to share their vast knowledge about medical matters and their noisy, ignorant certainty that the covid-19 jabs are wonderful, safe and effective.

It seems that everyone from the Queen to Lenny Henry and the Archbishop of Canterbury to Dolly Parton is now considered to be an expert on jabs and jabbing. Medical experts Meghan and Mrs Meghan are helping to promote the jabs though I’m surprised they found time to notice that anything was happening outside their sitting-room. I wonder if any of these people know that recently vaccinated teachers at a school in the US have been told that they can’t go back to school until more is known about the `vaccines’ and the clinical trials have been completed – that will be in 2023.

And, of course, internet influencers in search of a little free publicity have jumped on the jab bandwagon.

They glibly and enthusiastically offer reassurance and comfort, and listening to them all you’d think their wisdom was the result of years of study and investigation. They are so keen on the jab that they probably all have one of each type.

But I doubt if the celebrities who are busy promoting vaccines know any more about vaccines than they do about brain surgery. I doubt if any of them could remove an appendix or even syringe a clogged ear. How many patients would feel comfortable after hearing the words `Here’s Lenny Henry he’s going to perform your brain surgery today.’ Or `the Meghans will be operating on you this afternoon.’

No, I suspect that the celebrities’ apparent medical expertise is built not on study or experience but on a rather naïve trust in those who control the mainstream media and who have managed to convince the innocent, ignorant and the desperately eager that the covid-19 jabs are safe, effective and necessary if we are to escape from the totalitarian world in which we have been thrust. Day after day the papers are full of hysterical articles by ignorant journalists claiming that the jabs stop people getting covid and stop them spreading it if they do. The covid jabs were never tested to see if they provided immunity or prevented transmission and yet the lies just keep coming.

And if you are looking for a quick piece of proof that there is something very fishy going on I would offer this: although celebrities are encouraged to share their views about covid-19 and the vaccination programme, the people who are independent and who know the truth are banned from speaking out.

It is, surely, a trifle more than odd that the BBC, for example, is happy to promote the views of people who know as much about jabbing as I know about mountaineering or macramé but boasts that it refuses to give any time or space to medical qualified experts who question the promises being made, doubt the safety and efficacy of the vaccines, and are constantly demanding a chance to debate the whole issue in public. There isn’t anyone working for the BBC whose opinions are worth one of those little plastic bags full of doggy-doo. I’m told that under the guidance of Ms Spring, their version of the Witch-finder General, the BBC’s entire reporting staff was recently asked to design a new drinking mug for the canteen. They did a lovely job except that they put the handle on the inside.

Moreover, the independent experts are not only silenced, and refused any chance to air their views, they are also demonised, sneered at and lied about on a regular basis. Take a look at the video I made about how Wikipedia used lies and distortions to discredit me, damage me and stop people listening to the truth.

I’ve just been expelled from the Royal Society of Arts because of my views and my recent involvement in the BBC panorama programme. That’s what they said. My views and my involvement in the BBC panorama programme.

The Panorama programme was, of course, the unbalanced, biased programme where I was attacked for telling the truth but not invited into the studio to debate because the BBC, which likes to describe itself as a news organisation, is in fact known in the civilised circles where I like to move as a propaganda unit for the lunatics behind the global reset. The BBC, remember, boasts that it won’t ever give airtime to those questioning vaccination `whether they’re right or wrong’. Hardly a balanced approach.

As far as the RSA is concerned, the words crushing freedom of speech and ignoring the principles of a fair trial come to mind, as do the words bigoted and narrow-minded and in my view exhibiting the sort of intolerance usually associated with fascism.

The cryptorchid half-wits would no doubt now like to throw me out for linking them with fascism but they can’t because they have thrown me out already for telling the truth and with that level of intolerance on display they seem to me to be begging to be associated with Stalin, Mussolini and every uneducated and repressive force in history. Criticising me for being demonised on Panorama is like criticising someone for being struck by lightning or, more accurately, being mugged.

I don’t give a fig that they’ve expelled me but it’s a good example of how the truth is being suppressed and the truth-tellers are being demonised and exiled and how old-fashioned stuff like facts and medical debate are being oppressed. No trial, no discussion, no appeal as far as I know.

Everything I tell you is true. And I wish it were not.

The RSA provides a good example of how the supporters of Gates, Schwab, Blair and co are attempting to crush any and all opposition.

I’ve been writing about vaccines for five decades. My book on vaccines and vaccination was the bestselling book on the subject until it got mercilessly trashed by people who hadn’t bothered to read it. And yet in the last twelve months I have been denied access to all the mainstream media.

That should surely give even the most dedicated and enthusiastic jabbing supporter some reason to question what is going on.

And naturally, of course, they also refuse to debate any of the issues relating to covid-19. Independent medical doctors and scientists have been silenced, demonised and their views suppressed.

Since early 2020 I have repeatedly challenged Vallance and Whitty, the UK’s Chief Scientific Officer and Chief Medical Officer and the UK’s modern Scylla and Charybdis, to debate the whole issue with me, live on television. Naturally, the silence has been deafening. They appear on TV almost daily but they seem shy about sharing a studio with an old man in a chair.

The refusal of the mainstream media to allow time or space to independent experts who are questioning the vaccination myth is one big concern – a concern which, as I say, should surely cause bewilderment and doubt. (When I mentioned this to a senior hospital doctor the other day, he reassured me that the BBC and LBC had broadcast many balanced discussions and could not be dissuaded from this strange view.)

There are huge questions to be answered but none of the questions is being asked. For starters, will the people who have been given the mRNA jab still be entirely human? How much can you change a creature’s DNA without affecting its classification? And, remember, the jury still seems to be out on just how much these injections might alter human DNA. One drug company employee is quoted as having recently described mRNA vaccines as `hacking the software of life and installing a new operating system’.

I’m content with the software of life that God was kind enough to give me, thank you, and I don’t want a new operating system forced into me by Madge Hancock and Doris Johnson.

Add in the very real problem of pathogenic priming, which I have yet to see discussed in the mainstream media and the potential self-imposed travails of the gullible will be endless.

But there is another huge problem with the wild enthusiasm of the vaccine enthusiasts and celebrity promoters: the source of their information.

How do the Queen, the Archbishop of Canterbury, Dolly Parton, Lenny Henry et al know that the covid-19 jabs are safe and effective?

Well, unless they’ve all been hiding their lights under bushels and doing original research, I assume that their information comes from several sources: the Government, the media, the drug companies and the medical profession.

I have, during the last few months, been astonished at the way politicians and journalists have feted the vaccine producing drug companies and their executives.

I now rather suspect that knighthoods and peerages will be distributed widely in the next honours list. After all, Vallance, the ex GSK executive, has a knighthood and so does `Anal’ Schwab (a.k.a. Dr Strangelove) of the World Economic Forum.

All things considered, it wouldn’t surprise me to hear that Dr Crippen had been dug up and posthumously made an advisor or health matters. Why not? He has all the requisite attributes.

But anyone who trusts the covid-19 jab and its promoters is insane. Whatever happened to the old principle of `trust but verify’?

Anyone who knows anything about the world’s major drug companies would be less enthusiastic about taking their word on anything.

So, for example, in the UK, Pfizer was fined £84.2 million for overcharging the NHS by 2,600% and in the US Pfizer was hit with a $2.3 billion fine for mis-promoting medicines and paying kickbacks to doctors.

I’ve detailed these fines before but they’re worth going over again.

Look at AstraZeneca.

In 2014, AstraZeneca agreed to pay $110 million to settle two lawsuits brought by the state of Texas, claiming that it had fraudulently marketed two drugs. The Texas Attorney General, when he announced the settlements, said the company’s alleged actions were `especially disturbing because the well-being of children and the integrity of the state hospital system were jeopardised’.

AstraZeneca said it denied any wrong doing. So it paid out $110million for not doing anything wrong which was generous.

That wasn’t the only little problem for AstraZeneca.

The company had to pay $350 million to resolve 23,000 lawsuits.

The company was also charged with illegal marketing, including corrupt data in studies for marketing a drug to children, a sex scandal and a poorly run clinical trial that could have compromised patient safety and data reliability.

The study for this drug was financed by AstraZeneca and originally included 30 children – that’s not particularly small for a drug trial by the way – but only eight children completed the trial and the researcher who conducted the trial concluded that it was inconclusive. The researcher was paid at least $238,000 in consulting fees and travel costs.

However, the study was published anyway and led to a national recommendation that the drug be used as the leading choice for children.

Other studies which showed that a drug produced harmful results were never published and were covered up. A company email revealed: `Thus far, we have buried trials 15,31,56. The larger issue is how do we face the outside world when they begin to criticise us for suppressing data.’

After years of investigations Astra Zeneca paid a $520 million fine in the US and paid $647 million to settle global lawsuits.

In 2014, there was another scandal. After a trial described as sloppy, which resulted in a third of the participants dropping out because of side effects, results published in the American Journal of Psychiatry showed the drug as a promising treatment.

Then, there is GlaxoSmithKline, known to its enemies as GSK.

GSK is one of the world’s biggest pharmaceutical companies and in my view if it made toasters you’d never buy a toaster from them.

In 2014, for example, GSK was fined $490 million dollars by China after a Chinese court found it guilty of bribery.

The court gave GSK’s former head of Chinese operations a suspended prison sentence and they gave suspended prison sentences to other executives too.

In 2006, GSK paid out $160 million for claims made by patients who had become addicts.

In 2009, GSK paid out $2.5 million to the family of a three year old born with severe heart malformations. And in Canada, a five-year-old girl died five days after an H1N1 flu shot and her parents sued GSK for $4.2 million. The parents’ lawyer alleged that the drug was brought out quickly and without proper testing as the federal government exerted intense pressure on Canadians to get immunised.

In 2010, GSK paid out $1.14 billion because of claims over a drug called Paxil. And they settled lawsuits over a drug called Avandia for $500 million.

In 2011, GSK paid $250 million to settle 5,500 death and injury claims and set aside $6.4 billion for future lawsuits and settlements in respect of the drug Avandia.

In 2016, GSK paid out $6.2 million in Canada.

In 2017, GSK were ordered to pay $3 million to a widow.

In 2018, GSK faced 445 lawsuits over a drug called Zofran.

In 2012, GSK pleaded guilty to federal criminal offences including misbranding of two antidepressants and failure to report safety data about a drug for diabetes to the FDA in America. The company admitted to illegally promoting Paxil for the treatment of depression in children and agreed to pay a fine of $3 billion. That was the largest health care fraud settlement in US history. GSK also reached a related civil settlement with the US Justice Department. The $3 billion fine also included the civil penalties for improper marketing of half a dozen other drugs.

There are a couple of other things you should know about GSK which is now apparently helping to put together 60 million doses of the new Novavax vaccine at its famous Barnard Castle plant.

First, GSK is one of the top earning vaccine companies in the world. And in 2010, there were reports of narcolepsy occurring in Sweden and Finland among children who had the H1N1 swine flu vaccine. It is reported that not all the safety problems were made public. I have seen a report that by December 2009, for each one million doses of the vaccine given about 76 cases of serious adverse events were reported though this was not made public. A paper published in the British medical Journal in 2018 reported that GSK had commented that `further research is needed to confirm what role Pandemrix may have played in the development of narcolepsy among those involved.’

The writer of the BMJ article commented: `Now, eight years after the outbreak, new information is emerging from one of the lawsuits that, months before the narcolepsy cases were reported, the manufacturer and public health officials were aware of other serious adverse events logged in relation to Pandemrix. ‘

Second, Sir Patrick Vallance, is the Chief Scientific Adviser in the United Kingdom and, I suspect, a key figure in dealing with the coronavirus in the UK and the plans for a vaccine. Vallance worked for GSK between 2006 and 2018. By the time he left GSK he was a member of the board and the corporate executive team. All of the fines and so on which I have listed took place while Vallance was working as a senior figure at GSK.

These experimental injections are now being tested on young children and even infants. Why are we allowing this lunacy?

There is talk that children in the UK will start getting their jabs in August and most mothers say they are enthusiastic about this.

However, health and life insurance companies have said that they won’t pay out on deaths and injuries caused by the covid-19 injections because they’re experimental. For once, I don’t blame them. And, as I said earlier, some vaccinated teachers have apparently been told not to go back to work.

Does the word `experimental’ not concern anyone anymore? Does no one remember the Gulf War syndrome? How many soldiers were killed by the anthrax vaccine? Every criticism of vaccines and vaccination is dismissed as rumour, speculation and coincidence.

Drug company Johnson and Johnson has been linked with clinical trials in new-born babies, infants and pregnant women. I truly find it difficult to believe this is happening. Still, no doubt the BBC and the rest of the rotten media will be enthusiastic and forget to mention that J&J had to set aside $3.9 billion after lawsuits related to it flogging baby powder contaminated with asbestos.

And then there was $8 billion in punitive damages in 2019 after the company failed to warn that one of its drugs could lead to breast growth in boys. And $2.2 billion in civil and criminal fines for the same drug. And a huge multi million judgement after the company played a part in the opiod crisis.

Still J&J doesn’t have to worry now. Individuals cannot sue covid-19 vaccine manufacturers if anything goes wrong.

Naturally, the Medicines Health Regulatory Authority and Public Health England both agree with the UK government and insist that there haven’t been any adverse events worth noting with the covid jabs.

I’m not surprised. Both organisations have received huge sums of money from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation which has a huge shareholding in vaccine manufacturers.

Have you noticed how many amazing coincidences there are these days? Thousands of people die shortly after having the jab and they’re all put down as death by coincidence. There’s a pandemic of coincidences.

Bill and Melinda will no doubt be delighted to hear that Pfizer expects to generate $15 billion, or a quarter of its total revenue, from sales of its covid-19 jab. Moreover Pfizer say they expect there to be a long lasting need for covid-19 injections to combat new variants and boost waning immune responses.

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation also has financial links to Moderna, of course. And that should lead to more profits. The company is reported to believe that sales will reach almost $19 billion in 2021. (In 2019, pre covid, Moderna made a loss.)

The boss of AstraZeneca was paid £15.4 million in 2020 (or which more than £13 million was in bonuses) but he doesn’t need to be too disappointed because the company has announced that he will be paid more in future. I’m told that there are people at the BBC who don’t earn that much though most MPs seem to be earning so much from flogging masks, gloves and sanitiser that they wouldn’t bend down to pick up £15 million.

And then there are the GPs – all those kindly, and enthusiastic doctors happily jabbing anyone who will keep still.

I have for decades been documenting the way the pharmaceutical industry has bought the medical profession – and making enemies in high places as a result. My first book The Medicine Men, published in 1975, was about the way the drug industry controls the medical establishment.

The big vaccine manufacturers are, of course, forever handing out huge sums to persuade doctors to prescribe their products. Many doctors get big fees to speak at conferences or to put their names to articles in journals and magazines.

But the traditional bribery and corruption isn’t the only problem today.

GPs in the UK receive around £12.58 for every covid-19 injection (that’s twice the usual going rate for a vaccination – presumably to buy off any dissenters) and since two jabs are often recommended that’s £25 plus another £30 if the jab has to be given to someone in a care home.

So, work it out for yourself.

The average GP has 2,000 to 3,000 patients and so if they give 2,000 double-jabs that’s £50,000 in each doctor’s bank account.

Moreover, booster jabs are already planned for the autumn and I have no doubt that the injections will have to be repeated several times a year. So, that could be a bonus of £100,000 to £150,000 a year for keeping quiet about all the suspicions, reservations and side effects.

Oh, and most of the doctors won’t actually have to do the injecting. Nurses and care assistants (largely paid for by the NHS) will do the actual work.

So, now you can stop wondering why doctors aren’t speaking up and protesting about all this misplaced enthusiasm for experimental and entirely unnecessary jabbing. They are either stupid or maybe love the money more than they love their patients.

The medical profession, like the media, has been bought and very well paid for its silence. Those of us telling the truth, on the other hand, have been endlessly lied about and given absolutely no chance to debate the truth with the liars and the deceivers.

As with everything else in the covid-19 hoax, it’s all about power and money.

Power and money. Money and power.

And it’s important to remember that although they may have all the money, the bottom line is that if we use it properly we have all the power.

Vernon Coleman’s book Endgame explains the reasons behind the covid-19 hoax and what we can expect in the future. Endgame is available on Amazon as a paperback and an eBook.